|
On The Cultural Diversity of Latin America
By Abril Trigo
 It
has become almost a truism to celebrate, either with nationalist
bravado or with ethnographic gusto, the ethnic diversity,
colorful traditions, and cultural sumptuousness of Latin America.
Many times, if the celebration comes from officials of Latin
American governments, it resembles a tourist brochure or one
of those pathetic one-page-ads published from time to time
in some of the national newspapers in this country guaranteeing
unrestricted freedom to foreign investors. Very often too,
if the celebrants belong to the club of fans of Latin@s, they
tend to qualify their enthusiasm with a judicious caveat about
the social upheavals, economic disparities, political immaturity,
and customarily despotic regimes that characterize the countries
south of the Rio Bravo.
This picture is, of course, somewhat hyperbolic. Latin American
governments do not always behave that way, and many Europeans
and Americans have profound respect, backed by thorough information
and deep sympathy, for the Latin American peoples. However,
nowadays when the most tragic social circumstances are routinely
explained away through culture and ethnicity, and when multiculturalism
and diversity are the names of the game (the same way that
drinking wine and carrying a laptop is solid proof of sophisticated
cosmopolitanism), I opt to be suspicious every time I hear
the chants of the celebrants.
The usually forgotten fact is that the cultural diversity
of Latin America is the product of the complex, protracted,
and many times tragic history of political conflicts and social
struggles, geopolitical designs and foreign invasions, economic
exploitation and implacable acculturation suffered by the
peoples of Latin America since the incorporation of the continent
to the modern world in 1492. It is worth remembering
that the development and consolidation of Western modern capitalism
would have been impossible without the fundamental contribution
of the Americas, both material and symbolic. Particularly
of the riches extorted from the aboriginal populations and
the African slaves in the mines and the plantations which
were the very foundation of colonial mercantilism. The tons
of gold, silver, and so many other products extracted from
the colonies laid the foundation for the primitive accumulation
of capital that made Western modernity possible. Therefore,
Latin America was from the very beginning part of the modern
world, but precisely because of its colonial, and afterward
neocolonial status in the geopolitical scenario, Latin American
modernity was to be stigmatized by a triple damnation. Asphyxiated
by the laws of unequal and uneven development, Latin American
modern societies evolved as heteronomous (subject to others
dictates, without proper autonomy), heteroclite (anomalous
according to the Western model), and heterogeneous (composed
of dissimilar ethnic groups, living side by side with different
degrees of technological means, opposite cultural legacies,
and conflicting socio-political agendas). These are the foundations
not quite a cause for celebration of Latin American
cultural diversity.
We are all proud of the cultural richness, the ethnic diversity,
and the social complexity of Latin American societies, and
rightly so. Sometimes we discover the sumptuousness of our
cultures and the splendor of our peoples when we meet other
Latin Americans from countries very different to our own,
in the Latin@ diaspora. And when we identify each other, we
recognize each other in precisely those traits that make us
different. We are all proud of our cultures, but we have always
to remember the common roots of historical plunder and deception,
and the frustration and hope that we all share and that ultimately
make us what we are.
Abril Trigo is an Associate Professor in the Department
of Spanish and Portuguese.
|